Snoqualmie council heard arguments from Fletcher, Babcock and Panorama Apartment representatives, and were tasked with determining if the examiner erred in his decision on the conditional use permit.įletcher argued that the scale of the project is beyond what was required and it did not fit the character or scale of the city. Section 4.6.1 states that the permit may be requested if the proposal is for a site where the topography would lend itself to taller development because the buildings with additional stories would not appear higher than the three story structures. Fletcher and Babcock both appealed this second decision and a hearing for the second appeal was set for March 20. 23, McLean released a followup decision denying the appeal. Fletcher first appealed the decision to award the conditional use permit at public hearings on Nov. Snoqualmie residents Holly Fletcher and Adam Babcock each submitted an appeal to reverse the McLean’s decision. However, the city received requests to appeal the decision from citizens. In hearing examiner Gary McLean’s initial decision, the conditional use permit was awarded to the Panorama Apartments. One of those elements was a conditional use permit to authorize the building of a fourth story on five of the 11 buildings in the proposal.Īs part of Snoqualmie municipal code, a hearing examiner makes decisions on conditional use permit applications, Hofman said. In 2017, Panorama Apartments submitted a general land use application to the city that detailed four elements to be approved for development of the parcel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |